1996-03-12 - Re: [noise] Re: Do you feel lucky, punk?

Header Data

From: Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Message Hash: 143bc8e7c5512742dacc2529f0f6af0d8755d01b57cc667a3403cf5a83b5b014
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960312030008.4165F-100000@mercury.thepoint.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960311213348.11349A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-12 23:28:24 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 07:28:24 +0800

Raw message

From: Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 07:28:24 +0800
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Subject: Re: [noise] Re: Do you feel lucky, punk?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960311213348.11349A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960312030008.4165F-100000@mercury.thepoint.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Mon, 11 Mar 1996, Black Unicorn wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Mar 1996, jim bell wrote:
> 
> > At 05:54 PM 3/11/96 -0500, Black Unicorn wrote:
> 
> 3> At least, that is the position the prosecutors could surely take, 
> especially given this Supreme Court decision.
> 
> Uh huh.  They might also take the position that the defendent is ugly, 
> and should be convicted.  That doesn't make it a legally viable argument.

No, we usually go for the more general "I don't like the defendant." 


EBD
Assassination Politics target #xxxx.


BTW if I ever start lecturing cryptgraphers incessantly over days with 
rantings about the technical aspects of cryptography, I hope one of you 
tells me to shut the fuck up.





Thread