1996-03-21 - No Subject

Header Data

From: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
To: N/A
Message Hash: 1d9e5b14718230f1c781322b047c70017391ef6b488a5bf6f29e3b9524de1652
Message ID: <QQahxs05695.199603210110@relay3.UU.NET>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-21 23:13:20 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 07:13:20 +0800

Raw message

From: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 07:13:20 +0800
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <QQahxs05695.199603210110@relay3.UU.NET>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Alan Bostick writes:
> Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> wrote:
> 
> > I may have to adjust my position on Leahy's bill. Any legislation that
> > Dorothy Denning attacks so virulently must be worth passing. 
> 
> That could be exactly what They want you to think!

Oh, God. This is really a bit too much, don't you think?

I mean, its obvious that, whatever its flaws, passage of the Leahy
bill would be very bad for the export control droids. Has it occurred
to you that the whole thing might not be a conspiracy and that the
flaws in the bill might just be that -- flaws?

Perry





Thread