1996-03-09 - FCC v. Internet Phone?

Header Data

From: Mutant Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 263521f88f970e94158ab0c00723cddcd95dc456b54b8e2906be727162b1b8ae
Message ID: <199603090248.VAA01654@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-09 06:47:44 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 14:47:44 +0800

Raw message

From: Mutant Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 14:47:44 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: FCC v. Internet Phone?
Message-ID: <199603090248.VAA01654@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

I've done a scan of the NYT web site (www.nytimes.com) and the AP
and Reuters... no mention of this at all, though there's a new blurb
about another company promopting an Internet Phone type technology.

- --Rob
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMUDxiSoZzwIn1bdtAQFduAGArzYvmvL26xUQiag6etkyg/ysh8RUhTqX
s19MCcxWng+3T3frKu5P8eRju2XYBoF5
=Du5Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread