1996-03-01 - Re: Nortel “Entrust”

Header Data

From: SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>
To: jonathon@japan.sbi.com (Jonathon Fletcher)
Message Hash: 2fa02e94104fc6734442449b4d1840e2e83d598874b0355d834de43241fae1b1
Message ID: <96Mar1.074938edt.921@cannon.ecf.toronto.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960301161135.11367M-100000@doe905f>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-01 14:09:57 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1996 22:09:57 +0800

Raw message

From: SINCLAIR  DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1996 22:09:57 +0800
To: jonathon@japan.sbi.com (Jonathon Fletcher)
Subject: Re: Nortel "Entrust"
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960301161135.11367M-100000@doe905f>
Message-ID: <96Mar1.074938edt.921@cannon.ecf.toronto.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>   Is this worthy of further investigation, or is it suspect ? What is 
> CAST, and would it be classed as snake oil ?
CAST is discussed in _Applied Cryptography_.







Thread