1996-03-29 - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

Header Data

From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Message Hash: 3b4d77ae2f58919073fc88c6f4f2f4bbd77fd36fbb071956f838d48598b2ca34
Message ID: <199603290803.AAA06737@mail1.best.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-29 17:59:00 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 01:59:00 +0800

Raw message

From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 01:59:00 +0800
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Subject: Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?
Message-ID: <199603290803.AAA06737@mail1.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 03:43 PM 3/27/96 -0500, Shabbir J. Safdar wrote:
> Your misunderstanding of how interceptions are done is dangerous to
> what is otherwise a rational, intelligent argument.  
>
> Indeed, there are ways to conduct a wiretap without a judge.  They require
> dispensations from people like the Attorney General, for example.  And
> this is certainly not a normal practice.

I suggest that you study arithmetic before pontificating on normal government
practice:

1% of all phone capacity = 850 wiretaps a year.  Yeah, right.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread