1996-03-19 - Re: M$ CryptoAPI Question

Header Data

From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5b3cf9134c314c8e0ca9da6c9ce224ba56821a4d1a5caf12555d1d4695620af7
Message ID: <199603180605.WAA22290@dns1.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-19 20:43:25 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 04:43:25 +0800

Raw message

From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 04:43:25 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: M$ CryptoAPI Question
Message-ID: <199603180605.WAA22290@dns1.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 06:27 PM 3/17/96 EST, Dr. Dimitri Vulis wrote:
> I wonder if it's worth it to crack their approval mechanism so we can
> add our own crypto subsystems without asking Microsoft's approval.

Wait.

Wait for some apps to come out that use Microsofts crypto.

Wait until Microsoft makes some oppressive decisions, 
or is compelled to make some oppressive decisions.]

I do not expect that any cracking will be needed.  Microsoft 
will approve a freeware module for use in America, and then, 
alas alas, someone will leak it.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread