1996-03-09 - Re: Paint Your Own Scarlet Letter (Was: Edited Edupage, 29 Feb 1996)

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: frantz@netcom.com
Message Hash: 719c20cf642c0cfe5f611011c98c5f07472f5d003605603e8ea5c1a82aa1f0cd
Message ID: <01I23V0GL0YMAKTTTI@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-09 15:36:51 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 23:36:51 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 23:36:51 +0800
To: frantz@netcom.com
Subject: Re: Paint Your Own Scarlet Letter (Was: Edited Edupage, 29 Feb 1996)
Message-ID: <01I23V0GL0YMAKTTTI@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From:	IN%"frantz@netcom.com"  1-MAR-1996 21:54:54.53

>From SafeSurf Rating Page via lmccarth@cs.umass.edu wrote:
>>Thank you for making the Internet a safer place without censorship.
>>Until later, SafeSurfing to you!

	Incidentally, the strategy of simply rating one's page all 9's, if one
is required through some means of rating it at all, has the distinct advantage
of making any system using such filters more annoying to use. (One would, of
course, except any page making a political statement or other material that one
wanted to get out to as wide a number of people as possible). 

>(I think I want to start a web search engine looking for pages rated
>SS~~002 9, SS~~004 9, SS~~005 <5, and all the others don't care.)

	A configurable search engine on this basis could be very nice.
	-Allen 





Thread