From: Asgaard <asgaard@sos.sll.se>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 18:46:24 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: The all.net controversy continues
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SCO.3.91.960315101330.22528A-100000@grctechs.va.grci.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.91.960318034316.24533D-100000@cor.sos.sll.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Fri, 15 Mar 1996, Mark Aldrich wrote:

> If all.net's policy is really "nobody's allowed to telnet in," they why 
> don't they just shutdown the damn telnetd, and be done with it?  Or, if 
> they want only "authorized" personnel, why not add sufficient crypto to 
> secure the channel?

Yes, it's a mystery. Especially since the sysadmin, Dr. F. Cohen,
repeatedly assured this list, half a year ago, that his sites
were the only impenetrable ones in the internet universe, so
he should only have to sit laughing at these attacks.

Asgaard