1996-03-03 - Edited Edupage, 29 Feb 1996

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9c5deaebc82a6c6dad42b7e114783a8be7e2203703ea1d31dab61d15bc0c1875
Message ID: <01I1U06TWSP2AKTQC0@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-03 08:59:07 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Mar 1996 16:59:07 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 1996 16:59:07 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Edited Edupage, 29 Feb 1996
Message-ID: <01I1U06TWSP2AKTQC0@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From:	IN%"educom@elanor.oit.unc.edu"  1-MAR-1996 00:53:05.93

>*****************************************************************
>Edupage, 29 February 1996.  Edupage, a summary of news items on information
>technology, is provided three times each week as a service by Educom,
>a Washington, D.C.-based consortium of leading colleges and universities
>seeking to transform education through the use of information technology.
>*****************************************************************

	The below has some relevance for the discussion on firewalls vs
encryption. It seems to give evidence for the needed solution being either
firewalls and encryption (external _and_ internal) or encryption alone.

>NO SAFETY ON THE NET
>A recent survey of businesses found nearly one in four are staying away from
>the Internet because they worry about electronic security breaches.  For
>instance, Merrill Lynch refuses to use the Net for any "value-bearing"
>business and has doubts about allowing customers to link up via the
>Internet.  Meanwhile, if your company uses an Intranet, you're not immune to
>security problems -- experts estimate that as much as 80% of all security
>losses are committed by company insiders.  The technical staff manager at
>Bell Labs notes:  "Our firewall keeps the bad guys out.  But you can't say
>there aren't bad guys inside the company."  (Information Week 19 Feb 96 p34)

	The below is worrisome; I am willing to bet that the European
governments might try to require it, and that the US might follow suit if the
CDA gets tossed out (analogous to the V-chip). I'll send a further message
after I've analyzed the rating system in question a bit more.

>SELF-PATROLLING THE WEB
>The World Wide Web Consortium is pushing the Web page rating system that it
>developed in cooperation with the Platform for Internet Content Selection, a
>group of 22 online firms.  Operators at about 20,000 Web sites have already
>coded themselves using the Internet Relay System, which is similar to the
>rating system for films.  To rate your Web site, go to the SafeSurf site at
>< http://www.safesurf.com/ > and fill out the form that helps them come up
>with a rating.  PICS members plan to pitch the system to European
>governments in an effort to avoid continental content restrictions.
>(Investor's Business Daily 28 Feb 96 A6)

>Edupage is written by John Gehl (gehl@educom.edu) & Suzanne Douglas
>(douglas@educom.edu).  Voice:  404-371-1853, Fax: 404-371-8057.  

>Technical support is provided by the Office of Information Technology,
>University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

>***************************************************************
>EDUPAGE is what you've just finished reading.  To subscribe to Edupage: send
>a message to: listproc@educom.unc.edu and in the body of the message type:
>subscribe edupage Thomas Alva Edison (assuming that your name is Thomas Alva
>Edison;  if it's not, substitute your own name).  ...  To cancel, send a
>message to: listproc@educom.unc.edu and in the body of the message type:
>unsubscribe edupage.   (Subscription problems?  Send mail to
>educom@educom.unc.edu.)





Thread