1996-03-28 - Re: (X:x)e$ ‘s other use

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: llurch@networking.stanford.edu
Message Hash: afb948228dc0ac66346734b6989824fddcebe77ccc380434fffae6861fc06ad9
Message ID: <01I2STLT1O4C8ZDZ7I@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-28 06:42:53 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 14:42:53 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 14:42:53 +0800
To: llurch@networking.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: (X:x)e$ 's other use
Message-ID: <01I2STLT1O4C8ZDZ7I@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From:	IN%"llurch@networking.stanford.edu"  "Rich Graves" 22-MAR-1996 05:45:53.77

>Digital cash, if people can be convinced to trust it, will be a wonderful 
>thing because of its security, convenience, and anonymity features. I'm 
>sorry, but I just don't buy this "corrupt currency" schtick.

	While corrupt isn't quite the right word, the dollar is a
politically-influencable currency. And the politicians tend to press for
higher inflation and lower unemployment, because that gets them elected. The
Fed has done an actually rather admirable job of standing up to the pressure
(compared to how they might have behaved), but that we've got real inflation
testifies to that they haven't been completely successful. Moreover, the
banks that are in the Federal Reserve network have a motivation to have low
interest rates for what _they_ get charged, despite this inflating the
currency... thus, they've got some motivations to mismanage things.
	-Allen





Thread