1996-03-10 - Re: rhetorical trickery

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
To: “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
Message Hash: cc87fd81003260e1b3318d1c759ba493e064e7ea1c98f01c5914c145ec7fee77
Message ID: <5s9HkD33w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <199603082153.NAA28521@netcom4.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-10 06:26:52 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 14:26:52 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 14:26:52 +0800
To: "Vladimir Z. Nuri" <vznuri@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: rhetorical trickery
In-Reply-To: <199603082153.NAA28521@netcom4.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <5s9HkD33w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Lance Deitweller posting as Vladimir Z. Nuri <vznuri@netcom.com> writes:
> I noticed a rhetorical trick/trap that I've seen a lot lately, in the
> recent article posted about Phil Zimmermann.
>
> there is an infamous case of a child pornographer or pedophile in
> California that is sometimes cited by law enforcement representatives
> as a good example of the evils of encryption: supposedly he encrypted
> his diary and it couldn't be unlocked by them. this was mentioned in
> the article.

Did this really happen? I've never seen any concrete references to this
incident and strongly suspect it's another urban legend.

---

Dr. Dimitri Vulis
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread