1996-03-06 - Re: New PRNG method!

Header Data

From: lmccarth@cs.umass.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: e1c611a41792dbf5cc915552d310424b4243e28086ee0250d8698f272a255ccb
Message ID: <199603021754.MAA26203@thor.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <199603021741.MAA16483@homeport.org>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-06 07:46:57 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 15:46:57 +0800

Raw message

From: lmccarth@cs.umass.edu
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 15:46:57 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: New PRNG method!
In-Reply-To: <199603021741.MAA16483@homeport.org>
Message-ID: <199603021754.MAA26203@thor.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Olcay Cirit writes:
> PRNG? (Practical Random Number Gen.)

Incidentally, deliberately overloading a widely-used acronym with a 
similar (?) but distinct meaning is a Bad Thing, unless you're just out to 
confuse people.

Please, oh pretty please, consider reading some of the umpteen discussions
of proposed random and pseudorandom sources in the list archives and FAQs and 
books....    

-Lewis





Thread