1996-04-30 - Re: NOISE - AARMs

Header Data

From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
To: die@die.com
Message Hash: 1cfa15cf18ea12d38ee8f1eb4cc1513cb495b69d2cb9b15d858bc0ca8cfdd4d4
Message ID: <199604291501.LAA01169@nrk.com>
Reply To: <9604282326.AA01174@pig.die.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-30 02:46:23 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 10:46:23 +0800

Raw message

From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 10:46:23 +0800
To: die@die.com
Subject: Re: NOISE - AARMs
In-Reply-To: <9604282326.AA01174@pig.die.com>
Message-ID: <199604291501.LAA01169@nrk.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


> 	Why the Russians did not use this technology earlier 
> remains puzzling ... and why Dudeyev used a satellite phone
> which made him a sitting duck is even less clear.
> 
> 						Dave Emery
> 						die@die.com
>   

But there has been an easy defense against such for decades. 

You run ordinary phone wire from the transmitter + antenna X meters
back to the bunker or whatever. Then you talk from there.

X varies as afunction of the expected incoming.

I bought some surplus 1950's era field telephones with this
option built it -- they had a 150v B-battery [NOW i'm dating myself]
that was dropped across the pair when you squeezed the handset
Push-to-Talk. At the far end, a relay closed & turned on the
transmitter.


-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433





Thread