1996-04-13 - Re: questions about bits and bytes

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: “Richard Martin” <rmartin@aw.sgi.com>
Message Hash: 1f0b9bbaef9644051f1348f628e01fb4d076ab54c28f4f4635c5782cdd9f5237
Message ID: <m0u7Ov4-000903C@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-13 17:07:34 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 01:07:34 +0800

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 01:07:34 +0800
To: "Richard Martin" <rmartin@aw.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: questions about bits and bytes
Message-ID: <m0u7Ov4-000903C@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 09:50 AM 4/11/96 -0400, Richard Martin wrote:
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>On Apr 10,  6:57pm, jim bell wrote:
>> At 06:29 PM 4/10/96 -0700, Simon Spero wrote:
>> >No, bytes are no always 8 bits - some machines use(d) 9-bit bytes.
>> I notice you gave no examples.  Why is that?
>Perhaps he thought that most people who were interested could go look
>it up themselves.
>
>- From a really quick web search, we find that the SGI Impact jams 9-bit
>bytes [that's what it says] across the Rambus internally. I'm not sure
>if the memory itself is 9-bit.

Are you sure they're not referring to 8 bits of data and a parity bit?  In 
any case, please give the address to the list so that it can be checked out.






Thread