1996-04-05 - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: jimbell@pacifier.com
Message Hash: 273a1f21c12147221c7bea1589ed0b8ad5eab964b77b8f480c0f53f1766ae256
Message ID: <01I35I5KOWUU8ZE6BJ@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-05 07:12:57 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 15:12:57 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 15:12:57 +0800
To: jimbell@pacifier.com
Subject: Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?
Message-ID: <01I35I5KOWUU8ZE6BJ@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>

>Far more acceptable (and useful to us)  would be a rule which would mandate 
>the government's allowing the export of any program that had, say, the key 
>security provided by IDEA or less, regardless of what it did with that 
>encryption.  (Not that I want _any_ restrictions; it's just that such a 
>limit would make it impractically large to attempt to crack.)

	As I pointed out earlier, one way (that would cause the NSA types
problems trying to stop) would be to make legal for export anything which was
no harder for the NSA to break than what's already out of the country.
	-Allen





Thread