1996-04-02 - Re: Java flaw is in bytecode verifier

Header Data

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Message Hash: 371c2595fc90cf16a5eddc037cdbf6e179c452547dc30536379c23cb805e81c8
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960401222618.12235C-100000@chivalry>
Reply To: <199604020006.QAA21649@jobe.shell.portal.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-02 12:21:40 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 2 Apr 1996 20:21:40 +0800

Raw message

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 1996 20:21:40 +0800
To: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Subject: Re: Java flaw is in bytecode verifier
In-Reply-To: <199604020006.QAA21649@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960401222618.12235C-100000@chivalry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


My bet is currently on the flaw being due to a silly mistake in some part of 
the code dealing with returns from finally handlers. The Suspense Is 
Killing Me :)

---
They say in  online country             So which side are you on boys
There is no middle way                  Which side are you on
You'll either be a Usenet man           Which side are you on boys
Or a thug for the CDA                   Which side are you on?
  National Union of Computer Operatives; Hackers, local 37   APL-CPIO






Thread