1996-04-02 - Re: Test case for RSA t-shirts

Header Data

From: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
To: Dave Del Torto <ddt@lsd.com>
Message Hash: 49a5fe67bf3eea5416ede1385ca5052fb6221adcdbc37b4af7041bf929e4d581
Message ID: <3160E64E.46C9@netscape.com>
Reply To: <315D7895.307AB61A@cs.berkeley.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-02 13:38:00 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 2 Apr 1996 21:38:00 +0800

Raw message

From: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 1996 21:38:00 +0800
To: Dave Del Torto <ddt@lsd.com>
Subject: Re: Test case for RSA t-shirts
In-Reply-To: <315D7895.307AB61A@cs.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <3160E64E.46C9@netscape.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Dave Del Torto wrote:
> 
> At 1:08 pm 3/30/96, Raph Levien wrote:
> >   While we're on the subject, I called Sam Capino's office regarding my
> >CJR for this t-shirt, and he said they were still waiting for a response
> >from the NSA. I think my next move will be a letter asking exactly when
> >I can expect a response, and whether there's anything I can do to compel
> >a response, It was originally filed (in October) as a 15-day expedited
> >review.
> 
> FYI, PRZ mentioned to me last night that the CJR on the OCR-able book of
> PGP source is still pending. The "15 days" has stretched into about a year
> in that case, if I don't have my dates/the facts wrong. Bob Prior at MIT
> would know.
> 
> So much for expediency in commerce.

  I don't think that either the book or the t-shirt qualify for the expedited
review.  My brief skimming of John Gilmore's CJR site a few months ago left
me with the impression that only mass market commercial software that fit
within the SPA/govt deal (40-bit RC2 or RC4 with RSA keys <= 512-bits) was
eligible to be expedited.

	--Jeff

-- 
Jeff Weinstein - Electronic Munitions Specialist
Netscape Communication Corporation
jsw@netscape.com - http://home.netscape.com/people/jsw
Any opinions expressed above are mine.





Thread