1996-04-27 - Re: Golden Key Campaign
Header Data
From: Snow <snow@crash.suba.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4e88533dfcca64a10dbbed6c089ab8393d1755d624ab549b380cd4cb369f0568
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960426232131.371F-100000@crash.suba.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960424141313.12174A-100000@eskimo.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-27 08:41:25 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:41:25 +0800
Raw message
From: Snow <snow@crash.suba.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:41:25 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Golden Key Campaign
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960424141313.12174A-100000@eskimo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960426232131.371F-100000@crash.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In for a dime, in for a dollar.
On Wed, 24 Apr 1996, Wei Dai wrote:
> You can do signatures with Rabin too. I have a version of it in
> Crypto++ 2.0. It's been out for a while and RSA hasn't bothered me about
> it.
> Does anyone want to explain why, given the alternatives, people continue
> to use RSA and pay for it?
Reputation Capital?
Petro, Christopher C.
petro@suba.com <prefered>
snow@crash.suba.com
Thread
Return to April 1996
- Return to “Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>”
- Return to “Snow <snow@crash.suba.com>”
Return to “Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>”
- 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 07:17:16 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
- 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 14:23:16 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
- 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:41:25 +0800) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - Snow <snow@crash.suba.com>
- 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 14:23:16 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>