From: Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 02:52:54 +0800
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Subject: Re: [Political Rant] Was: examples of mandatory content rating?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960413211541.9295G-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9604141600.A8552-0100000@netcom15>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Sat, 13 Apr 1996, Black Unicorn wrote:


> And like any ratings system, it relies on the raters subjective 
> judgement.  Not a very market stable or market wise system.  Tell me who 

	Since somebody else brought up SurfWatch, remember that 
	it was SurfWatch that declared whitehouse.org to be 
	off-limits for obscene content.  A mistake on their
	part --- or at least that is their claim.  << This
	was just before CDA passed, btw.   >> << I personally
	thought it was a great way to demonstrate the absurdity 
	of CDA.  >>

        xan

        jonathon
        grafolog@netcom.com



**********************************************************************
*								     *
*	Opinions expressed don't necessarily reflect my own views.   *
*								     *
*	There is no way that they can be construed to represent      *
*	any organization's views.				     *
*								     *
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
*	ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/gr/graphology/home.html	     *
*								     *
***********************************************************************