1996-04-11 - On computer face recognition:

Header Data

From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: K00l Secrets <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 995c4c747c8639100982a3d9ea67ee867c907d5c2d8568898d7b46c420f288a5
Message ID: <199604110601.XAA05984@dns2.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-11 16:49:40 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 00:49:40 +0800

Raw message

From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 00:49:40 +0800
To: K00l Secrets <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: On computer face recognition:
Message-ID: <199604110601.XAA05984@dns2.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On computer face recognition:


>> Shaving probably will not be a problem, but holding your head at a
>> slightly different angle...  will screw up the system totally,
>> unless the system has radically improved since the last time I read
>> up on it.

At 11:45 AM 4/9/96 -0500, K00l Secrets wrote:
> Well, the systems I have seen are quite good at finding people's eyes.
> Scaling (for distance), and rotation (for the angle of your head)
> therefore don't really confuse the system once it has your eyes.

Finding the eyes can only control for rotations in the plane of 
the image, when you tilt your head to one side.  They cannot 
handle the much more common case of 3D rotations, where you 
look slightly to the right or slightly to the left of camera.
Facial expressions also throw them badly.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread