1996-04-06 - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

Header Data

From: sameer@c2.org
To: unicorn@schloss.li (Black Unicorn)
Message Hash: a4fee77a4e710eaefdd6822c74520bbccd768ca8e3cb788dbef1deeecbf12a14
Message ID: <199604051727.JAA02353@atropos.c2.org>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960404182031.758A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-06 02:35:45 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 10:35:45 +0800

Raw message

From: sameer@c2.org
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 10:35:45 +0800
To: unicorn@schloss.li (Black Unicorn)
Subject: Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960404182031.758A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Message-ID: <199604051727.JAA02353@atropos.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


	What's the point here, or is Unicorn just having fun
lambasting Jim Bell?

	My basic attitude, running an internet privacy provider, is if
Mr. Govt. wants my data, and gives me a court order (subpoena,
"compelled discovery", whatever), then I'll give it to 'em.
	If my customers that they were looking for had any brains at
all, a court order, compelled discover, whatever, will not help
Mr. Govt. That's the cornerstone of my security model.

	Or am I confused about what you are talking about here.

-- 
Sameer Parekh					Voice:   510-601-9777x3
Community ConneXion, Inc.			FAX:     510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider			Dialin:  510-658-6376
http://www.c2.net/ (or login as "guest")		sameer@c2.net





Thread