1996-04-13 - Re: Lotus Notes 24-bit sellout

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: Jerry Whiting <jwhiting@igc.apc.org>
Message Hash: ccd5d5188ece65f49a3da9d60b3ea0ad4986fc002ebde39c53bc71417aff5e17
Message ID: <199604131607.MAA27918@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <199604121621.JAA01379@igc2.igc.apc.org>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-13 19:15:11 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 03:15:11 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 03:15:11 +0800
To: Jerry Whiting <jwhiting@igc.apc.org>
Subject: Re: Lotus Notes 24-bit sellout
In-Reply-To: <199604121621.JAA01379@igc2.igc.apc.org>
Message-ID: <199604131607.MAA27918@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Jerry Whiting writes:
> Definitely a deal with the Devil.  Given that we're talking about IBM, not 
> Lotus none of this surprises me given IBM's Lucifer/DES history with spook 
> input years ago.  Then again to be fair, I don't know if the 40+24 deal 
> was cooked up before or after the IBM/Lotus merger.
> 

Lucifer wasn't any stronger thatn DES. Please learn a bit about the
history of how DES was developed and what attacks it was built to
withstand. The story is all 100% public at this point.

Perry





Thread