1996-04-14 - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: sandfort@crl.com
Message Hash: cd9165c1401636692172050f8cad51cc8d1b70fd3800db7e5dc417f0d411052f
Message ID: <01I3IE1P3TXW8Y51D0@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-14 06:13:08 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 14:13:08 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 14:13:08 +0800
To: sandfort@crl.com
Subject: Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?
Message-ID: <01I3IE1P3TXW8Y51D0@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>

>To which Jim Bell wrote:
 
>> And the rest of us are tired of seeing those non-responses!

>Exactly for whom is Bell speaking?  Jimbo, please let us know 
>who has given you a limited powers of attorney to be their
>mouthpiece.  It's sad when someone (correctly) deems their
>opinions too weak to stand without (dare I say it?) pseudo-
>spoofing by reference.

	I got rather tired of the Jim Bell - Black Unicorn debates a while
back... and I was getting tired of _both_ sides. Neither came off very well.
One reason was that they kept talking past one another, as someone else
pointed out a bit back and neither bothered to notice.
	-Allen





Thread