1996-04-22 - Re: Anonymnity at teleport

Header Data

From: Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ec83550c4cc52823fec9961de0642f8672dc0e81598c8ccaffdb0f95a2b59cfd
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960421221944.006df628@mail.teleport.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-22 04:43:05 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1996 12:43:05 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1996 12:43:05 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Anonymnity at teleport
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960421221944.006df628@mail.teleport.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 05:29 PM 4/21/96 EDT, Allen wrote:
>	A bit of interesting information about teleport. Still not as good
>as c2 (as I stated), but it's still good to have multiple anonymous account
>providers around... whether or not they mean to be anonymous. This is from a
>sysadmin type there (why I deleted the name) who I'll ask about the Majordomo
>patch.
[snip]

And to think I gave them my real name...

Do check about the majordomo patch.  It's saved list owners here a lot of
headaches.  I'm not sure what it would take to implement, but the end result
is very good, IMHO.


Rich

       
______________________________________________________________________
Rich Burroughs  richieb@teleport.com  http://www.teleport.com/~richieb
See my Blue Ribbon Page at http://www.teleport.com/~richieb/blueribbon
New EF zine "cause for alarm" - http://www.teleport.com/~richieb/cause






Thread