1996-05-06 - Re: Key

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li> (by way of loki@infonex.com (LanceCottrell))
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0d775560c299ae2f01a4f27be31e4b1072ec21edbc65945a4b1538a952c910db
Message ID: <adb3dbd3000210041855@[206.170.115.3]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-06 23:34:42 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 07:34:42 +0800

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li> (by way of loki@infonex.com (LanceCottrell))
Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 07:34:42 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Key
Message-ID: <adb3dbd3000210041855@[206.170.115.3]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 5 May 1996, Lance Cottrell wrote:

> Why did you decide to create this additional key. What role are you
> reserving the other one for?


It's more convenient for me to sign on a multi-user system.  As I don't
want to compromise my main key, a lower security document signing key
would seem in order.

Feel free to copy this to the list.


---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com







Thread