1996-05-29 - Re: [Fwd: –> CRISIS on USENET – SIGN THE PROTEST STATEMENT VIA E-MAIL]

Header Data

From: s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
To: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Message Hash: 153dd62fb383a0db483796df0d33f1aef52b9dc409032424289b51834e84aedf
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9605291127.B10285-0100000@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca>
Reply To: <01I59HR1QWW68Y5191@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-29 20:35:08 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 04:35:08 +0800

Raw message

From: s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 04:35:08 +0800
To: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: --> CRISIS on USENET -- SIGN THE PROTEST STATEMENT VIA E-MAIL]
In-Reply-To: <01I59HR1QWW68Y5191@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9605291127.B10285-0100000@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




On Wed, 29 May 1996, E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:

> 	I am curious as to what systems these throw-away accounts are on; they
> would appear to be good output systems for ephemeral remailer endpoints.
> Admittedly, I suspect that this will take ecash remailers unless they're all
> through systems like aol.com that accept credit cards with inadequate
> verification (from what I know, check digit(s) only).

AOL's been mass-mailing intro packages (I just got one) with free time. I 
presume we will be seeing a rise in spam as more service providers try 
these marketing techniques.





Thread