1996-05-24 - Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…”

Header Data

From: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
To: sameer@c2.org
Message Hash: 5e25d8eaa24bc802a6b4145d92c4d0ab65fa9a29e98d6838f57e6333d82716cc
Message ID: <199605240112.VAA20633@crypto.com>
Reply To: <199605231937.MAA25268@clotho.c2.org>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-24 05:05:19 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 13:05:19 +0800

Raw message

From: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 13:05:19 +0800
To: sameer@c2.org
Subject: Re: [SCARE]: "If you only knew what we know..."
In-Reply-To: <199605231937.MAA25268@clotho.c2.org>
Message-ID: <199605240112.VAA20633@crypto.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I don't think I actually got "the breifing", if any such standard briefing 
actually exists.  What Sameer is probably thinking of is that the seven
authors of the "key length report" were invited down to DC to talk with a
bunch of high-level policy types, but they never showed us the bodies (or
the files on us, or whatever it is they show the people who they really want
to impress).

-matt

[NB, please send any reply directly to me; I don't read the list with any
regularity these days, and saw this message only because someone mentioned
it.  thanks.  -matt]


> > 
> > Paraphrasing the "Wired" item, "No person who has ever received "The
> > Briefing" has ever again argued forcefully for the rights of citizens to
> > use strong cryptography."
> 
> 	It's my understanding that this statement is now false. I
> believe that Matt Blaze recently received "The Briefing" and he is
> still on our side.
> 	(I personally think it was a mistake on their part to give him
> said Briefing, as they should have realized he couldn't be
> converted. Now that someone has "withstood the Briefing" it gives them
> less credibility.)
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sameer Parekh					Voice:   510-601-9777x3
> Community ConneXion, Inc.			FAX:     510-601-9734
> The Internet Privacy Provider			Dialin:  510-658-6376
> http://www.c2.net/ (or login as "guest")		sameer@c2.net






Thread