From: Bovine Remailer <haystack@cow.net>
Date: Wed, 15 May 1996 12:17:39 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Civil liberties of employees (Re: FYB_oss)
Message-ID: <9605141836.AA01074@cow.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


[Wildly off-topic...]

Michael Froomkin wrote:

...

>...And there's a lot more
>than skimpy outfits at issue, including a refusal to hire men for what are
>allegedly food service jobs (gender may only be a determination of
>employment if it is a bona fide occupational qualfiication, e.g.  policing
>the showers in the gym; gender is not a BFOQ for food service jobs.)

Being a "Hooters Girl" is not a typical "allegedly food service"
job. [Because it's an election-year] the EEOC dropped the case,
but not before Tom Hazlett did an *excellent* piece on it in
REASON. _Corporate Rakeovers_, Feb. 1996 p. 66