1996-05-14 - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: Allen Ethridge <ethridge@onramp.net>
Message Hash: 69a4cf34f3d1d923ef44e61907ab0e74be6f075e8269f8d139d15b6ce2171dcb
Message ID: <Pine.GUL.3.93.960513234411.19375E-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <199605140009435096233@stemmons34.onramp.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-14 12:35:58 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 20:35:58 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 20:35:58 +0800
To: Allen Ethridge <ethridge@onramp.net>
Subject: Re: Fingerprinting annoyance
In-Reply-To: <199605140009435096233@stemmons34.onramp.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.93.960513234411.19375E-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 14 May 1996, Allen Ethridge wrote:

> I can't speak to the honorable senator Exon's situation, but my brother
> is being required to provide his fingerprints to prove that he is fit to
> be the legal guardian of his wife's daughter.  And it isn't his wife,
> currently the sole legal guardian, who is questioning his fitness or
> demanding his fingerprints.

It's times like those that Jim Bell makes some sense. SOME.

-rich






Thread