1996-05-01 - Re: Freedom and security

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: Mike McNally <angels@wavenet.com>
Message Hash: 71b7c275598d2b98f8d6956b7d86487141676f62225e0da423da150a2f531fd0
Message ID: <m0uEJnz-000930C@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-01 03:45:52 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 1 May 1996 11:45:52 +0800

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 1996 11:45:52 +0800
To: Mike McNally <angels@wavenet.com>
Subject: Re: Freedom and security
Message-ID: <m0uEJnz-000930C@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 07:47 AM 4/29/96 -0500, Mike McNally wrote:
>CyberAngels Director : Colin Gabriel Hatcher wrote:
>> My position is to seek a balance between the freedom of the individual and
>> the security of the community.  My argument is that when the security of
>> the community is threatened by the freedom of the individual, the community
>> will always prioritise its safety.  Good government of course means
>> maintaining individual freedoms *and* maintaining community security.  I
>> actually disagree that they are antithetical.  On the contrary they are a
>> balance that any society has to find. 
>
>If they weren't antithetical, there'd be no need for a balance. 

Game, set, and match McNally!






Thread