1996-05-23 - Re: Long-Lived Remailers

Header Data

From: hendersn@zeta.org.au (Zed)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 79d55ab7ae0962cc91452d0889fb043d20fcd4a1707b14aaf86e66e10a4c240b
Message ID: <199605231319.XAA19785@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-23 18:27:12 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 02:27:12 +0800

Raw message

From: hendersn@zeta.org.au (Zed)
Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 02:27:12 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Long-Lived Remailers
Message-ID: <199605231319.XAA19785@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Ideally the final emanation point will be epherimal indeed.  Perhaps only a
>few minutes or an hour or two.

I really like this idea. How about instead of a full-scale remailer being
the final jump of the message, you have a _very_ simple remailer set up
along the lines of anon.penet.fi. No encryption, just strip off the headers
and send the message to its final destination. Sorry for being clueless in
how this works(I'm learning as fast as I can), but wouldn't this kind of
system be incredibly easy to start up and fold? You could have a host of
such final emanation points winking in and out of existence while the actual
encrypting remailers remain relatively safe.
  Zed(hendersn@zeta.org.au)
"Don't hate the media, become the media" - Jello Biafra
  PGP key on request






Thread