1996-05-17 - RE: Java & signed applets

Header Data

From: Gregg Weissman <geeman@best..com>
To: “‘E. ALLEN SMITH’” <lyalc@ozemail.com.au>
Message Hash: aeb6812742e3b909a361369c7e92bcabec0129c873ccce75ce36fee4f1505e7c
Message ID: <01BB42BC.F0F08500@geeman.vip.best.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-17 19:43:33 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 03:43:33 +0800

Raw message

From: Gregg Weissman <geeman@best..com>
Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 03:43:33 +0800
To: "'E. ALLEN SMITH'" <lyalc@ozemail.com.au>
Subject: RE: Java & signed applets
Message-ID: <01BB42BC.F0F08500@geeman.vip.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Well,that day is not all that far off, when there is trusted h/w, or trusted components, on the desktop.
This will be the usual two-edged sword ....

----------
From: 	Lyal Collins[SMTP:lyalc@ozemail.com.au]
Sent: 	Thursday, May 16, 1996 8:02 AM
To: 	E. ALLEN SMITH
Cc: 	Cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: 	Re: Java & signed applets

Signing anything is somewaht a waste of time, unless the verification
siftware is highly trusted, and there is good intergity/authenticity
control of the root public key(s).
So, in geneal - ho hum - until trusted hardware is available on the 
desktop.
lyal
-- 
All mistakes in this message belong to me - you should not use them!









Thread