1996-05-31 - Re: NRC Cryptography Report: The Text of the Recommendations

Header Data

From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
To: hfinney@shell.portal.com (Hal)
Message Hash: b25a0e622bcd94fd544b09a04d5e80a64ca40e76f627b2b85a903158a3e26f18
Message ID: <199605311115.HAA05118@nrk.com>
Reply To: <199605302304.QAA14424@jobe.shell.portal.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-31 17:49:23 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 1 Jun 1996 01:49:23 +0800

Raw message

From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 1996 01:49:23 +0800
To: hfinney@shell.portal.com (Hal)
Subject: Re: NRC Cryptography Report: The Text of the Recommendations
In-Reply-To: <199605302304.QAA14424@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Message-ID: <199605311115.HAA05118@nrk.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


> 
> I read the overview of this, and while it is good that the report calls
> for maintaining the legality of domestic encryption and some slight
> loosening of the export rules, overall I was diappointed.

Watching faces at the NPC, it was clear there was lots of private
divergence midst the panel. A further indication of this was that
three of them refused to get clearances. 

I'd say the report was a success based solely on the fact the
Administration does not like it ;=|

-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433





Thread