1996-05-03 - Burns Bill

Header Data

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ba6bc719deec54c1b7f7c44af0f2c206168e97bdbe99c23f3bfb46b705dc98b8
Message ID: <199605022252.PAA01532@netcom8.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-03 07:14:43 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 15:14:43 +0800

Raw message

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 15:14:43 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Burns Bill
Message-ID: <199605022252.PAA01532@netcom8.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


A quick read thru the text of the bill (via http://www.cdt.org/crypto/)
shows none of the principle objectionable features of the Lehey bill. 
(Standards for key escrow agents, and additional criminal penalties for
using encryption to hinder an investigation.)

This bill has some obscure, to me, exceptions.  The most troubling of which
I think means (IANAL) that export can be restricted if there is a
reasonable expectation that the hard/software will be reexported to one of
the countries on the extreme bad boys list.  This provision could possibly
be construed to affect FTP sites, but in any case, it is not clear how
passage of the bill could possibly make things worse.

Its provisions preventing the Secretary of Commerce from developing
standards for anyone except government agencies, and forbidding mandatory
GAK/key escrow are very welcome.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       | The CDA means  | Periwinkle  --  Computer Consulting
(408)356-8506     | lost jobs and  | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | dead teenagers | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA







Thread