From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: JMKELSEY@delphi.com
Message Hash: c775fd37cdd33eaa2ad8dd0d63a98563a91477fb18518814279642af9b49f6b4
Message ID: <01I4FP585MH88Y59D8@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-08 06:09:10 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 May 1996 14:09:10 +0800
From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Wed, 8 May 1996 14:09:10 +0800
To: JMKELSEY@delphi.com
Subject: Re: Escrowing signing vs. encryption keys
Message-ID: <01I4FP585MH88Y59D8@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: IN%"JMKELSEY@delphi.com" 7-MAY-1996 01:22:19.14
>this is seen by the Feds to balance out the downside that, if I have
>the ability to do secure signatures with certificates, I can always
>use Diffie-Hellman to establish a secure session with someone else.
This apparant opinion on their part is made more understandable with
the headaches involved in using Diffie-Hellman, as I understand it (multiple
back-and-forth transfers, et al).
-Allen
Return to May 1996
Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
1996-05-08 (Wed, 8 May 1996 14:09:10 +0800) - Re: Escrowing signing vs. encryption keys - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>