1996-05-04 - Re: Has Tim turned anti-PGP?

Header Data

From: “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c9775cd769cbd1192191e6ab5c84b6e5b56dab4f68725955c91f49c15773dfaf
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960503152917.190A-100000@gak>
Reply To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960503031848.470A-100000@bitbucket.edmweb.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-04 07:05:59 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 4 May 1996 15:05:59 +0800

Raw message

From: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Date: Sat, 4 May 1996 15:05:59 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Has Tim turned anti-PGP?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960503031848.470A-100000@bitbucket.edmweb.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960503152917.190A-100000@gak>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Fri, 3 May 1996, Steve wrote:

> > Unless the information is "secret," why bother? It adds extra time at his
> > office's end (you don't think Leahy types in his password to PGP do you?),
> > and it accomplishes little.
> 
> I agree with you to this point... Personally, I don't encrypt or even sign
> anything I send out, unless there is a reason to. For most of the mail I
> send out, I don't care if third parties read it, and most of it is so
> unimportant that if it were altered (highly unlikely) I wouldn't care. In
> fact, I can't recall the last time I encrypted a message (but I've signed
> a couple recently).

Since I use UNIX, I have set up the mailing program so that it actually takes
extra effort to not sign something.  I have nothing to lose by signing my
e-mail messages.  Yes, I know that not everyone in the world uses UNIX and
I don't know if there is a transparent mailing interface for Windoze or
Macintosh.  As for encryption, I encrypt a lot of my messages because if I
only encrypted "secret" messages, that would automatically draw suspicion
to every encrypted message that I send.  I also always use ssh to log into my
UNIX shell account.  I know the probability of someone intercepting my
password is low, but again I have nothing to lose.

> Now that's just plain un-cypherpunk of you. If people want to use PGP, let
> them use PGP! There are so many scripts etc. out there to make using PGP
> almost transparent, so decrypting your mail shouldn't be any harder than
> pressing a couple keys and typing in your passphrase. (I know, the
> passphrase is the killer.)

As I said above, there is plenty of integration between PGP and UNIX mailers,
but such is not the case for Windoze and Macintosh.

- -- Mark

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
markm@voicenet.com              | finger -l for PGP key 0xf9b22ba5
http://www.voicenet.com/~markm/ | bd24d08e3cbb53472054fa56002258d5
"The concept of normalcy is just a conspiracy of the majority" -me


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBMYpgfbZc+sv5siulAQFF1QP8DHrxzW3pkBxmHzWqUy5N79f3ECr2JJZa
IFwwFnbj9T5d2ueqG7Ec7sGLk/HE4CfPky4WfZrRzJ3tNYOcgegYdKmvJ7Dv6W8z
A5QSRtDo6YMko43goQgglXzuYDN65sBwwpIHoA6Qm2mjwSykBnmwrUJexOvR0aw9
gYBwt7pLYL0=
=LdvT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread