1996-05-20 - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: llurch@networking.stanford.edu
Message Hash: cf3c44b4846193411b04630b90a7a7a7b33b95666f68629f7d268c19a766fa76
Message ID: <01I4WUJDSY8C8Y5FKU@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-20 09:51:31 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 17:51:31 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 17:51:31 +0800
To: llurch@networking.stanford.edu
Subject: Re:  SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST
Message-ID: <01I4WUJDSY8C8Y5FKU@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From:	IN%"llurch@networking.stanford.edu"  "Rich Graves" 18-MAY-1996 09:07:35.05

>On Thu, 16 May 1996, Bill Stewart wrote:

>> ==================================================================
>> This message was posted from the anonymous remailer at www.jim.com.
>> Send any complaints to webmaster@www.jim.com .
>> Please don't post any copyrighted material longer than fair use quotations.
>> And did you know that Scientology's highly overpriced documents say that
>>         "<random paragraph quotation>"
>> ===================================================================

>Once I was more or less done laughing and got off the floor, it occurred
>to me that this could provide a revenue stream for anonymous remailers. 
>You'd charge advertisers sub-pennies for these little trailers. I
>understand that Sameer is getting very little Ecash for his
>remail/by-www.html, but maybe if he sold advertising space?

	It's an interesting idea. One wonders if EFF would be interested in
such a sponsorship? One could even add, say, an ACLU promotion to the end of
messages without getting cash from the ACLU - this might encourage them to give
more backing in case of a legal dispute. (You scratch my back, I scratch
yours... I'm not meaning to be offensive to the ACLU, BTW.)
	-Allen





Thread