1996-05-22 - Re: Hiding remailers behind nymservers…? (fwd)

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: d092e3ec7de8ea13e908c2ae14a7e780f62c183cf8a3e95ebb0a8e9e81de7b33
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960521183638.1238C-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Reply To: <adc741aa1f021004ca2d@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-22 06:28:23 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 14:28:23 +0800

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 14:28:23 +0800
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: Hiding remailers behind nymservers...? (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <adc741aa1f021004ca2d@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960521183638.1238C-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 21 May 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:

[...]

> Now it may be that operating a remailer may be interpreted by some courts
> as being a "public nuisance," a theory I credit to Brad Templeton, but this
> has not yet come even close to happening.

Brad might be on the mark.
One famous case ended in the result of declaring a union leader a public
nusiance.

> --Tim May

---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com






Thread