1996-05-14 - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance

Header Data

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
To: “Mark O. Aldrich” <maldrich@grci.com>
Message Hash: e56d01f1f86299105ba4a6b6ccf74e288728acb6b0e3b41b5957db4f126bbb8a
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960513182710.21739J-100000@larry.infi.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SCO.3.91.960513134249.7157D-100000@grctechs.va.grci.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-14 07:42:15 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 15:42:15 +0800

Raw message

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 15:42:15 +0800
To: "Mark O. Aldrich" <maldrich@grci.com>
Subject: Re: Fingerprinting annoyance
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SCO.3.91.960513134249.7157D-100000@grctechs.va.grci.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960513182710.21739J-100000@larry.infi.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


He who wants an Other Guy to certify him as a good guy is a supplicant. If 
the Other Guy wants you to get naked and stand on your hands in front of 
the Dutch Queen's front lawn, then that's their rule and you make your 
choice about obeying.

If the Other Guy wants your fingerprints so he can check whether you're 
escaped from prison for a mail fraud conviction, well: that's their rule.
If you want the Other Guy to certify your good character, then give your 
fingerprints. If you don't like it, then ply your trade without their 
peice of paper. You don't have a God-given right to have the peice of paper.

Your customers and clients can decide if they still want to hire you.





Thread