1996-06-20 - Re: Current status of RSA patent…

Header Data

From: “Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
To: “Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 0ae8d07681b34f22b9e7c80e01b3f1457dcda367640d4926bb8265f4c8b0ad17
Message ID: <199606200543.BAA29268@unix.asb.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-20 10:16:42 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 18:16:42 +0800

Raw message

From: "Deranged Mutant" <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 18:16:42 +0800
To: "Paul S. Penrod" <furballs@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Current status of RSA patent...
Message-ID: <199606200543.BAA29268@unix.asb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On 19 Jun 96 at 13:25, Paul S. Penrod wrote:

> PGP 2.6.2i is not US codebase, and RSA is not patented outside the US 
> according to Bruce Schneiner. Therefore, if a product was deployed into 

Note that Bruce's expertise is in cryptography, not patent law.

> the US using a non-US codebase, it is unclear to me what legal 
> jurisdiction (if any) RSA may have in these circumstances.

It's a violation of RSA's patent wherever RSA is patented (in the US 
only, I believe).  Doesn't matter who wrote the code, or where.

Oh yeah: PGP 2.6ui or 2.6.3i is based on US versions.  I believe they 
still use some of PRZ's code.

And don't forget that IDEA is patented by Ascom Tech AG.

Rob.


---
No-frills sig.
Befriend my mail filter by sending a message with the subject "send help"
Key-ID: 5D3F2E99 1996/04/22 wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (root@magneto)
        AB1F4831 1993/05/10 Deranged Mutant <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
Send a message with the subject "send pgp-key" for a copy of my key.





Thread