1996-06-06 - Re: Markoff in NYT on NTT/RSA chip

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0cdb414b7a280b65c5c60aaf8c148282efba68885cf34da3bde8ac34dc8ce48c
Message ID: <199606060356.UAA15845@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-06 10:00:01 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 18:00:01 +0800

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 18:00:01 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Markoff in NYT on NTT/RSA chip
Message-ID: <199606060356.UAA15845@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 09:33 PM 6/5/96 -0000, nelson@crynwr.com wrote:
>David Lesher writes:
>
> > So Motorboatarola puts chips in the domestic MTSO's. 
> > For the international ones, they leave the chips out.
>
>Crypto hooks, or more properly, crypto pads. 

This raises a question:  If you provide a place for a crypto chip but don't 
install it, shouldn't you be able to export it?  But the software analogy, 
crypto hooks, the government is trying to restrict them.  This is why I 
think the latter interpretation is flawed:  Historically, the mere fact that 
a system can interface to another one that can do crypto can't be used to 
restrict it.

Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com





Thread