1996-06-11 - Re: Report from Germany on “backdoor” net-censorship

Header Data

From: jaed@best.com (Jeanne A. E. DeVoto)
To: um@c2.org (Ulf Moeller)
Message Hash: 12c37763686f6e268f3319a08367614dc0cef63a6e03016df1ad5b430018aa79
Message ID: <v01540b00ade249ef4c82@[205.149.167.81]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-11 04:14:54 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 12:14:54 +0800

Raw message

From: jaed@best.com (Jeanne A. E. DeVoto)
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 12:14:54 +0800
To: um@c2.org (Ulf Moeller)
Subject: Re: Report from Germany on "backdoor" net-censorship
Message-ID: <v01540b00ade249ef4c82@[205.149.167.81]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:10 PM 6/9/96, Ulf Moeller wrote:
>Furthermore, sample news articles will be suject to detailed legal
>evaluation. Should this result in suspicion or proof of transportation
>of illegal contents, the ICTF can launch various steps to work against
>propagation of these contents. For example, it can arrange for
>blocking of complete newsgroups or retrospect "Cancel" of articles
>already transmitted.

Um. Does this ICTF understand the implications of sending forged cancel
messages outside its own server, when the cancels are based strictly on
disapproval of the content? Do they realize what the consequences will be
for carriage of traffic from their node?

Is Germany about to become known as "Cancelbunny Nation"?

>Internet Media Counsil presents fist measurements for Voluntary
>Self-Control

This is a wonderful type in the fifth word above... ;-)

--
The Internet interprets the US Congress as system damage
and routes around it.   - with apologies to John Gilmore







Thread