1996-06-09 - Re: [NOISE] Re: RFD: Time to kick some anti-scientologist ass?

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 278bb83e125d757f1a810196c210b2a0258b9fac494073384aa79d5d2501a48d
Message ID: <qwc0oD83w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <2.2.32.19960609071830.009e7374@mail.teleport.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-09 17:56:00 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 01:56:00 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 01:56:00 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [NOISE] Re: RFD: Time to kick some anti-scientologist ass?
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960609071830.009e7374@mail.teleport.com>
Message-ID: <qwc0oD83w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com> writes:
> I don't know of any "Anti-Scientologists" who are forging cancels.

Check out the Lasarus reports on alt.religion.scientology -- 5000 lines,
6000 lines, 7000 lines...

>                                                                     I
> really doubt anyone would have checked with Dimitri first, though :)

The forged cancels started a short time after one prominent anti-scentologist
flamer e-mailed me and asked for a copy of my cancelbot. (The first time I've
seen him being quasi-polite! :-) The cancels look like they came from my 'bot,
and are directed at _anything posted by certain Co$ supporters.

I don't care about the bizarre religion views of the present or former cult
members, but forging cancels makes you as much of a slime as Co$.

I note that you chose to ignore the cypherpunks-relevant portion of my question
- that the anti-scientologists have been abusing the cypherpunks remailers.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread