1996-06-10 - Re: Gore opposes unwarranted’’ Internet censorship

Header Data

From: “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
To: reagle@MIT.EDU>
Message Hash: 30c4cb6cbeffe509ad18df35b22e028f757441420282238905849e71cc63d2bd
Message ID: <Alirsxq00YUy0aELd7@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply To: <9606100105.AA23760@rpcp.mit.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-10 06:05:36 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 14:05:36 +0800

Raw message

From: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 14:05:36 +0800
To: reagle@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: Gore opposes unwarranted'' Internet censorship
In-Reply-To: <9606100105.AA23760@rpcp.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <Alirsxq00YUy0aELd7@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 9-Jun-96 Gore opposes unwarranted''
.. by Joseph M. R. Jr.@MIT.EDU 
>         Sounds good but I had to laugh when I heard it... is he at odds with
> other members of the administration, or is this rhetoric?

Heh. It's rhetoric, but it's also a sign of the shift in political tides
in DC. Now it's possible for politicos to claim the CDA went a bit too
far -- but they waited for a broad, corporate, mainstream challenge to
the CDA and a negative reaction to the DoJ's arguments from the judges
before they felt comfy taking this position.

Jack Fields, chair of House telecom subcom, made similar mouthings last
month in a speech I reported on in this month's (or was it last month's)
Internet World.

Also check out my f-c dispatch #13 for background on Gore's stand.

-Declan






Thread