1996-06-06 - Re: On the Hill: Child Porn “Morphing”

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 393ec2feea064f30ee2aecbefe8da795dcc0996bc704d71796f3aa95e0cde169
Message ID: <m0L3oD10w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <199606050531.WAA27734@netcom7.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-06 10:15:40 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 18:15:40 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 18:15:40 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: On the Hill: Child Porn "Morphing"
In-Reply-To: <199606050531.WAA27734@netcom7.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <m0L3oD10w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz) writes:

> At  4:45 PM 6/4/96 -0400, Black Unicorn wrote:
> >"Morphing" seems to be the latest buzzword for putting childrens faces on
> >the bodies of adult models in sexually explicit poses and seems to have
> >attracted enough attention to warrant congressional attention.
>
> The ability to use the faces of famous political people (e.g. Bill&Hillery
> or Bob&Libby) in XXXX rated political satire probably has a wider market.

This is a cool idea - I wonder if there's an FTP site with X-rated doctored
pictures of the KKKlintons.  Would a morphed image of Chelsea performing
fellatio on Slick Billy be protected as political satire?

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread