1996-06-05 - Re: Markoff in NYT on NTT/RSA chip

Header Data

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: Paul Robichaux <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 40bafb384dcc661270f63176e1dbc342ad2a8c39d5b49cd28752898dde94b903
Message ID: <199606042119.OAA07875@netcom7.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-05 05:19:55 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 13:19:55 +0800

Raw message

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 13:19:55 +0800
To: Paul Robichaux <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Markoff in NYT on NTT/RSA chip
Message-ID: <199606042119.OAA07875@netcom7.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 12:08 PM 6/4/96 -0500, Paul Robichaux wrote:
>2. Markoff's story says that NTT doesn't have licenses to use RSA
>technology (the quote from Junichi Kishigami), but the bit about safely
>swapping private-key info makes me wonder if instead they're using DH-- the
>patent for which expires next year. A telecom chipset could make productive
>use of DH for key exchange at call setup.

They could use RSA for key exchange outside the USA because RSA is only
patented in the USA.  With a license for RSA they could also sell them in
the USA.  My reading of the New York Times article is compatible with the
view that Jim Bidzos is driving a hard bargin for such a license. 
(However, the article does say that NTT has already sold chips to IBM in
the US.  I guess you can sell, but not deliver, until you get the license.)

Obviously if you are outside the USA, you will buy your equipment from
Japan Inc.  US manfactures will be frozen out.  (However the US can still
compete for the Chinese market since such privacy will be illegal there
:-). )


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       | The CDA means  | Periwinkle  --  Computer Consulting
(408)356-8506     | lost jobs and  | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | dead teenagers | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA







Thread