From: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 07:31:41 +0800
To: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Subject: Re: Anonymous remailers mentioned in CDA decision
In-Reply-To: <EljtUzK00YUyR7NsIY@andrew.cmu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960613114908.23962A-100000@viper.law.miami.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Given the extraordinaryly good findings of facts, the government will have
a very very tough time on appeal.  Shows you what fine lawyering can do.


On Thu, 13 Jun 1996, Declan B. McCullagh wrote:

> Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 12-Jun-96 Re: Anonymous remailers
> men.. by Dr.Dimitri V. KOTM@bwalk 
> > This statute's language pretty much forces DOJ to appeal, even if they think
> > the law sucks.
> 
> What, precisely, in the statute's language *forces* the DoJ to appeal?
> 
> It is the Solicitor General's decision. At close of business today, the
> DoJ still hadn't told me whether they would or not. But we expect they
> will.
> 
> -Declan
> 

A. Michael Froomkin        | +1 (305) 284-4285; +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)
Associate Professor of Law | 
U. Miami School of Law     | froomkin@law.miami.edu
P.O. Box 248087            | http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin
Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA | It's warm here.  And humid.