1996-06-26 - Re: domain name zapping threat by Internic

Header Data

From: “Lynne L. Harrison” <lharrison@mhv.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 845a90b66395fe84f89259471138c5989e8d4347bc60abef51037adfd7a275f5
Message ID: <9606260152.AA24057@mhv.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-26 07:13:29 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 15:13:29 +0800

Raw message

From: "Lynne L. Harrison" <lharrison@mhv.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 15:13:29 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: domain name zapping threat by Internic
Message-ID: <9606260152.AA24057@mhv.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 10:21 PM 6/25/96 GMT, Greg Miller wrote:
>
>	Since the NIC charges $100 per registration, you can bet there will be
>some legislation somewhere along the line.  They must be makeing 5000-10000%
>profit.

  Regarding NIC's policy concerning the taking away of domain names if X
states Y usurped his trademark, there are at least 4 suits pending wherein
the domain name owners/plaintiffs are challenging the alleged infringement,
namely:

First lawsuit - Roadrunner v. NSI
background at: http://www.patents.com/nsi.sht
complaint at: http://www.patents.com/nsicpt1.sht

Second lawsuit - DCI v. DCI and NSI
background at: http://www.patents.com/dci/dci.sht
complaint at: 
http://infolawalert.com/source/src061496_dc_complaint.html

Third lawsuit - Giacalone v. NSI et al.
complaint at: http://zeus.bna.com/e-law/cases/giac.html

Fourth lawsuit - Clue Computing v. NSI
background at:  http://www.clue.com/legal/index.html
complaint at:  http://www.clue.com/legal/complain.html

Fun and games....

Regards -
Lynne




*************************************************************
Lynne L. Harrison, Esq.      |     "The key to life:
Poughkeepsie, New York       |      - Get up;
lharrison@mhv.net            |      - Survive;
http://www.dueprocess.com    |      - Go to bed."
*************************************************************

DISCLAIMER:  I am not your attorney; you are not my client.
             Accordingly, the above is *NOT* legal advice.







Thread