1996-06-03 - Re: Sun pushing SKIP for intranets and java

Header Data

From: Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>
To: perry@piermont.com
Message Hash: 945214d35815f6f4722137d74d484145c9aaf6f8a8be8964b73dd2621ec6f93e
Message ID: <31B2E2E3.5D1A@vail.tivoli.com>
Reply To: <199605272346.TAA08318@jekyll.piermont.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-03 17:48:35 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 01:48:35 +0800

Raw message

From: Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 01:48:35 +0800
To: perry@piermont.com
Subject: Re: Sun pushing SKIP for intranets and java
In-Reply-To: <199605272346.TAA08318@jekyll.piermont.com>
Message-ID: <31B2E2E3.5D1A@vail.tivoli.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Perry E. Metzger wrote:

> If thats true, its a remarkably bad idea. The IP security layer isn't
> anywhere near the layer where you should be doing things like signing
> Java applets.

I think that the SKIP stuff would be intended to protect on-the-wire
marshalled objects when using the CORBA or RMI stuff to do inter-VM
method invocation.  The signature stuff is a whole 'nuther enchilada.

(I assume, Perry, that you weren't at the fabulous JavaOne thing last
week, because I didn't notice anyone spontaneously combusting from all
the hype :-)

______c_____________________________________________________________________
Mike M Nally * Tiv^H^H^H IBM * Austin TX    * pain is inevitable  
       m5@tivoli.com * m101@io.com          *
      <URL:http://www.io.com/~m101>         * suffering is optional





Thread