1996-06-29 - Re: John Grubor and you

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>
Message Hash: 99fbab208800bf658202dfb1a130600147681f0800e6cf133ccabbdcc8e7a8d7
Message ID: <Pine.GUL.3.94.960628230701.24211G-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <199606290307.FAA23142@basement.replay.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-29 08:43:07 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 16:43:07 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 16:43:07 +0800
To: Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>
Subject: Re: John Grubor and you
In-Reply-To: <199606290307.FAA23142@basement.replay.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.94.960628230701.24211G-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sat, 29 Jun 1996, Anonymous wrote:

> Lucifer Remailer Operator wrote:
> 
> >Just for the record, I am NOT John Grubor and had never even heard of him
> >before I did an Altavista search on his name earlier today.  The concept that
> >some net.loon like Grubor would get another account with DHP to run an
> >anonymous remailer for whatever reason is LAUGHABLE.  From what I have read,
> >Grubor spams newsgroups quite often, something I have not done nor plan on
> >doing.  I was expecting people to be posting paranoid rantings about how I
> >am obviously a SPOOK...
> 
> Why you were expecting people to be posting paranoid rantings if you did
> not even know who Dr. John Grubor, undercover police agent, was?

Gee, given the anonymous paranoid rants that greeted nym.alias.net and the 
SAFE conference, I can't imagine...

-rich






Thread